Statement of the Farmer’s Constituency from APRCEM at the APFSD 2016

Read By: Wali Haider, Roots for Equity, Pakistan & Focal Point of the Farmers Constituency

April 3, 2016

DSC_8239

Respected Chair, Excellences, Delegates. Colleagues from the UN Agencies, Major Groups and the CSOs

I am Wali Haidar from Roots for Equity, Pakistan representing Farmers’ Constituency at the Asia Pacific Regional CSOs Engagement Mechanism.

We heartily welcome the emphasis that Executive Secretary Ms. Shamshad Akhtar placed on the urgent need to remove poverty and hunger, in her opening remarks. Asia Pacific faces special and additional challenges with regard to poverty and hunger and in ensuring sustainable development. More than 65% of global population in hunger is located in Asia Pacific. While Goal 1 and Goal 2 has special emphasis on removing hunger and including food security, many other goals also touch upon the measures supporting this goal. However, we are concerned that well understood concept of food sovereignty, which connects sustainable agriculture, food security, self-sufficiency, synergistic relationship between the farmers and farming, and national sovereignty in terms of policy space on issues of food and agriculture has suffered an obvious oversight within the SDGs,

Dear Chair, Excellences and Friends,

Though we have enough food production to feed the global population, reportedly more than 800 million people lie in the vicious circle of hunger. If we are to consider nutritional and food safety aspect, the number of people having inadequate food will rise manifolds. Climate change impacts, poisoning of land with excessive use of chemical fertilizers and the pesticides, emphasis on industrial agriculture despite the fact that a number of studies including that from IAASTD saying that small and family farmers are the ones who feed the world. Lack of right to land and secure tenurial rights to the farmers and particularly women farmers, grabbing and subversion of agricultural land, neloliberal policies including economic, trade and aid policies adversely affecting rights and sovereignty of farmers, small food producers, indigenous people and fisherfolk etc.

The push for liberalization of agriculture under the WTO rules followed by a plethora of free trade agreements has provided global corporations market access to the developing countries, while agricultural products from developing countries are subject to various tariff and non tariff barriers in developed countries market. Farmers in developing countries also face hugely unequal playing field with large export oriented subsidies in developed countries, while food stocking programmes in poor and developing countries are under intense pressure by developed countries to be dismantled. Trade liberalization in its wake has allowed wide-spread practice of chemical intensive industrial agriculture, agro fuel production, and genetically engineered seeds and crops. Agriculture and food production being marked as a lucrative sector has resulted in a tsunami of land grabs. At the same time, the pursuance of mega development projects for economic development and climate change mitigations such as mega dams, mining, oil exploration, creation of national parks, high voltage transmission and distribution lines and pursuance of extractive industries and special economic zones in indigenous territories and other rural communities with subsequent militarization process has led to land alienation and destruction of survival sources, cultures and identity of indigenous peoples, small scale farmers, fishing communities.

We strongly recommend that APFSD roadmap must

Recognize indigenous people’s rights over their land and resources and take their free, prior and informed consent before pursuing any forms of development processes affecting their land.

Recognize and ensure land rights of small and landless farmers, including women farmers;

Land lease to the private sector including foreign sovereign states, corporations and investors should not be allowed, especially when land rights of small producers and communities are being violated;

Ensure the right to healthy, nutritious, culturally appropriate food for all.

Recognition and implementation of local and traditional knowledge systems for food and agricultural production to strengthen the livelihood, health of local communities and to conserve biodiversity;

Premised on food sovereignty, promote and implement sustainable agriculture practices in order to cope with climate crises and environmental catastrophe.

Eradication of toxic chemical agricultural production systems that are injurious to the health of all living-beings, pollute ecological systems and destroy biodiversity.

Economic growth model must be premised on ensuring decent livelihood that delivers a living wage to all small producers especially women.

Thank you for your attention.

Controversy over commercial use of GM corn seeds

ASHFAK BOKHARI

A HEATED controversy is raging over whether or not the government has given a go-ahead to some multinationals to make commercial sale of GM corn seeds at a time when the Seed (Amendment) Bill, which allows it, has yet to be passed by the Senate.

The companies claim to have received a formal permission and licences from the Ministry of Climate Change. But in response to a point of order raised by an opposition MNA in the National Assembly a fortnight ago, two federal ministers Khurram Dastgir and Sikandar Hayat Khan Bosan categorically denied that the government had given licence to any multinational company for commercial trial of GM (genetically modified) corn seeds. GM corn is stated to be a crop with serious side-effects because of cross-pollination that can contaminate other non-GM crops within a range of 200-500 metres.

The question that remains unanswered is which authorities have given permission to the seed companies. The National Bio-safety Centre, whose committee normally gives approval, is not functional these days and there is none to monitor the new technology and gather data.

However, the permission, if at all, has been given without conducting the required field trials of the GM seeds and this, the critics say, constitutes a clear violation of the national bio-safety laws and the international standard operating procedures. But Croplife, the industry’s representative body, insists that the authorities concerned have already given the go-ahead.

The country’s laboratories are not in a position to handle the situation and its institutions are also not capable of monitoring and regulating the GM corn crop.

Croplife also claims that the Technical Advisory Committee’s sub-committee for field monitoring visited all trial sites in each growing season for collecting data and assessing compliance. The reports for each season and each year were submitted to the relevant departments and ministries.

Besides, it said, the sub-committee for GM corn commercialisation had thoroughly reviewed all the field trial reports to assess the risk and concluded that GM corn is as safe as non-GM corn.

Maybe, instead of field trials involving farmers, some observers say, small-scale tests in confined areas were conducted in certain government institutions and universities. No insect resistance management programme was considered and no proper Refugia was planned. Refugia means a 5-10pc area covered by a crop where non-GM seeds are cultivated to delay resistance.

Monsanto, a leading US seed multinational, claims that the government had recently allowed commercialisation of its GM corn in Pakistan after a long and rigorous process starting from 2009. Aamir Mirza, CEO, of Monsanto Pakistan says that “the government has accepted our two technologies namely Insect Protection and Herbicide Tolerant.”

He said that a monitoring sub-committee had visited fields for assessment of trials a number of times in each growing season and during this period, the company had followed a proper procedure for seeking approval from the National Biodiversity Committee and it went for seed imports and field trials only after the approval was received.

A former chief of Environment Protection Agency, Asif Shuja, says the decision had been taken in haste by the government with no proper procedure followed or risk assessment carried out. This could raise grave problems in future.

The country’s laboratories, he says, are not in a position to handle the situation and its institutions are also not capable of monitoring and regulating the GM corn crop. There is need for a proper risk assessment of the new technology and to ascertain whether the manpower, institutions and system available at the moment could tackle the challenge.

Local seed industry officials are of the view that since the government has no option but to support the biotech industry because of political reasons, what is needed is a strong regulatory system to strengthen the biotech research and development activities.

According to the findings of the World Bank’s International Agency for Research on Cancer made public in March 2015, glyphosate — a chemical in herbicides that are widely used on GM crops — is ‘probably carcinogenic to humans’. Glyphosate is used in a US multinational’s branded herbicide Roundup Ready, which can be sprayed on crops that have been genetically modified to tolerate glyphosate.

Many Pakistani NGOs and farmer organisations have been opposing the GM technology for its anti-farmer bias and health risks. Many of them have written to the Senate’s chairman, asking him to reject the draft Seed Act 2014 and enact a new law in its place that protects the interests of small farmers who under the present bill could be fined and imprisoned for preserving, selling and exchanging seeds, a centuries-old tradition that has helped them produce grains in surplus.

Published in Dawn, Business & Finance weekly, April 4th, 2016

http://www.dawn.com/news/1249740/controversy-over-commercial-use-of-gm-corn-seeds

Experts question approval of GM corn, cotton to be sold in market

JAMAL SHAHID

ISLAMABAD: The government has approved over 100 varieties of genetically modified corn and cotton to be sold in the market, but the move has drawn concern from some agriculture experts.

They have argued that the regulatory system and national bio-safety laws, and the standard operating procedure for the commercialisation of genetically engineered technology have been ignored.

Defending the government, recently appointed Ministry of Climate Change Secretary Syed Abu Ahmad Akif, expressed his team’s confidence in the integrity of the approval process.

Experts say bio-safety laws, SOPs for commercialisation of genetically engineered technology have been ignored

He said: “The technical advisory committee (TAC), made up of agriculture scientists from around the country, recommended 113 varieties of GM corn and cotton for field-testing and commercialisation. All these recommendations have been approved.”

However, experts maintain that multinational seed producing companies had only conducted small scale two-year regulatory trials in confined fields at their premises.

These companies did not carry out large scale nationwide adaptability trials before selling genetically modified technologies to local farmers as required under international and national laws.

The trials are necessary to check the performance of genetically engineered seeds in domestic environments and assess the risk of imported genetically modified technologies on the local environment and on humans.

“A unique example has been set in the world, where no risk assessment has been conducted of genetically engineered technologies,” a senior official from the Pakistan Agriculture Research Centre (PARC) said.

One of the main concerns of many agriculture experts is that the approved varieties of genetically modified corn and cotton contain herbicide-resistant gene. The PARC official said: “These GM technologies require extensive pesticide sprays, such as Roundup glyphosate, to kill pests and control weeds. Over 34 species of weed have developed resistance against glyphosate around the world, causing super weeds to develop.”

Last year, the World Health Organisation announced that glyphosate, which is a key ingredient in pesticides such as the Roundup herbicide, is a human carcinogen.

PTI MNA Dr Arif Alvi also expressed concerns over the matter in parliament last week. In response to his questions, both Commerce Minister Khuram Dastagir Khan and Minister for National Food Security and Research Malik Sikandar Hayat Khan Bosan stated that multinational seed and pesticide production companies were not permitted to market their genetically modified technologies.

However, the country head of the multinational genetically modified seed production company Dupont, Nadeem Mirza, told Dawn that his company can now sell new genetically modified corn seed technologies to farmers.

Aamir M Mirza, the country head at Monsanto, said: “Large scale trials could not be carried out until these technologies, tested and approved in other countries, were approved by local authorities. Large scale trials will now be done after the government has permitted us.”

PTI’s Dr Alvi has said he will move a breach of privilege motion for being mislead in parliament.

“Genetically engineered seed technologies have not been tested in large scale areas. GM corn is a highly cross-pollinating crop and can contaminate other, non-GM crops. GM technologies might be the need of the future, but all the safeguards must be followed before alien varieties of crops are introduced in Pakistan that can endanger its indigenous strategic crops,” he said.

Some of the first countries to adopt genetically engineered cotton, such as India, China and Australia, have not allowed genetically modified corn to be grown on their soil, fearing health and environmental hazards.

Dr Inayatullah, who has a PhD in Entomology (pest control) from the Oklahoma State University, said that once sown, genetically modified crops such as corn will interfere with indigenous crop varieties and harm the natural evolutionary process. He argued that genetically modified varieties would give rise to new pests that would likely endanger Pakistan’s indigenous crops, particularly sugarcane, rice, wheat and sorghum.

“GM crops trigger allergies, diabetes and cancer. This is true in America, one of the largest consumers of GM foods and highest numbers of diabetes and cancer patients,” he said.

Experts have said that in 2014, multinationals had asked to import genetically modified corn and cotton seeds from the United States and the Philippines for large scale testing to assess environmental and health hazards. According to documents available with Dawn, they were not given permission.

In 2014, the Lahore High Court ordered the climate change ministry not to issue licences and no-objection certificates for the trial and commercialisation of genetically modified technologies.

Published in Dawn, March 28th, 2016

http://www.dawn.com/news/1248351/experts-question-approval-of-gm-corn-cotton-to-be-sold-in-market

March 29 Day of the Landless

Press Release:

 NO TO LAND GRAB!

Pakistan Kissan Mazdoor Tehreek (PKMT) and Roots for Equity along with Asian Peasant Coalition and other Asian organizations has celebrated the Global Day of the Landless under the theme “Heighten the struggle against global land grabbing! Resist Imperialist Plunder on Land and Resources!” This day marks the struggles of millions of farmers across the globe who have been evicted forcefully. A vast majority of these evicted farmers are those who lived in these lands for many generations.

????????????????????????????????????

To mark the Day of the Landless, PKMT held a protest in front of the Lahore Press Club on March 29, 2016. At the protest, Raja Mujeeb, National Coordinator, PKMT stated that thousands of farmers across Pakistan were facing forceful evictions faced because of the ongoing land grab prompted by the Pakistani government for promoting corporate agriculture, free trade zones and so called development projects. Farmers from many districts of Punjab participated in the protest including farmers from Rakh Azmat Wala, Rajanpur who face forcefully eviction from lands they have tilled for nearly a century.  Tariq Mehmood, Khyber Pakhtunkwa (KPK) Provincial Coordinator, PKMT stated that the KPK government has issued notifications in Hattar, Haripur to evict farmers from 1,000 acres of land for the development of Hattar Economic Zone. These farmers had been tilling this land for many decades and the notification will result in at least a thousand families to be evicted forcefully. According to Hakim Gul, Sindh PKMT member, the Sindh government had also embarked on similar imperialist land grab policies –huge chunks of land is being allotted to foreign corporations for corporate agriculture and building energy power plants.

????????????????????????????????????

Zahoor Joya, Punjab Provincial Coordiantor PKMT stated that the Punjab government and their touts were forcefully evicting the farmers of Rakh Azmat Wala in Rajanpur. These farmers since March 2015 have not been allowed to sow any crops; it is tragic that instead of giving state land to the landless, the state is deliberately taking away land from settled farming communities. Kabir Khan a member of the Committee Rakh Azmat, representing the farmers from Rakh Azmat Wala, stated: “We have not been able to grow wheat, our food crop for two seasons and cash crops such as cotton and tobacco which are our only means of livelihood. At the same time, our livestock is also dying from hunger and thirst. All because the state is not allowing us to grow crops and fodder on our own lands.” Other Committee Rakh Azmat members elaborated that the British in the 1920s had promised them land entitlements to this land which their ancestors had converted to tillable land; false promises that were continued over the decades – even the current government officials had promised land entitlement in lieu of votes. But after their government was formed they have actually conspired to snatch 3581 acres of land from Rakh Azmat Wala community to give to foreign corporations and powerful political families.

????????????????????????????????????

Today, due to land grab, thousands of evicted farmers in Pakistan are facing loss of livelihood, hunger and misery. Land, instead of being provided to the landless is being handed over to corporations and foreign investments. PKMT and Committee Rakh Azmat demands that the Punjab Government should immediately put a stop to steps being taken for evicting the Rakh Azmat farmers. In addition, the act of land evictions from the entire country should be stopped and instead equitable land distribution should be carried out in order to attain food sovereignty and national sovereignty.

????????????????????????????????????

Released by Pakistan Kissan Mazdoor Tehreek and Committee Rakh Azmat Wala;

Urdu Press Release

29 March Landless Day Urdu Press Release

News Paper Coverage Links

http://e.thenews.com.pk/lahore/3-30-2016/page14.asp

http://e.jang.com.pk/03-30-2016/lahore/pic.asp?picname=02_01.jpg

http://e.dunya.com.pk/index.php?e_name=LHR&edate=2016-03-30&page=9

http://lahore.ausaf.pk/?p=14285

http://dailypakistan.com.pk/E-Paper/Lahore/2016-03-30/page-9/detail-4

http://epaper.dailykhabrain.com.pk/popup.php?newssrc=issues/2016-03-30/7328/falha.JPG

http://www.dailysadaewatan.com/paper/30-03-2016/popup.htm?p8/a047.gif

Tragedy of Infant mortality from drought in Thar

Press Release

Pakistan Kissan Mazdoor Tehreek (PKMT) while addressing a protest on the issue of malnutrition and child mortality in Thar due to lack of food. The protestors expressed serious concern over the dreadful situation of Thar. Leaders of PKMT said that New Year comes with the promises of happiness in the world but in Thar, a district of Sindh, comes with reports of hunger, poverty, malnutrition and death which added difficulties in the life of Thar residents.

DSC_0305

Estimation of infant mortality is calculated from the records of public hospitals while there is no record of deaths from remote areas. It should be clarify that the so called nominal aid is only able to reach just around Mithi and other tehseel’s headquarters while waiting children of suburbs died without getting assistance. Much of the deaths are accounted for the reasons of food shortage.

It is clear that drought and lack of food are neither spontaneous nor impossible to solve. As in previous years, this year government again claimed that the crisis in Thar is not related to malnutrition and lack of food but the children deaths due to pneumonia and other diseases while facts told quite another story. National Federation Survey showed 70 percent of mothers are suffering from vitamin A deficiency in Sindh, almost half of children failed to develop their mental and physical stability and 40% of children weighs less than their age. According to the World Food Program most of Tharparker’s population suffers from food insecurity that has been living on food shortage. Nutritional deficiencies among women and children reduced immunity then they are easily prone to disease. These facts clearly show that poverty, unemployment and food scarcity are the main causes of Thar issue, leading child mortality and other complexities.

‘Some NGOs have started various activities to address nutritional deficiencies in children’ for PKMT ‘this is not the permanent and sustainable solution of this issue’. According to locals, once 50kg of wheat’s sack in three or five months provided by the provincial government doesn’t solve of their hunger, poverty, starvation and many other problems. They want that decent jobs to fulfill their nutritional needs. Drought has caused the extinction of animal fodder and many lost their cattle & livestock which were the main sources of getting food.

DSC_0323

Pakistan Kissan Mazdoor Tehreek (PKMT) believes that the foundations of this crisis due to unfair distribution of wealth in society where the weakest class is deprived of employment because of not having access to productive resources. Majority of farmers do not have their own land which is the major cause and needs permanent solution. PKMT demands permanent transfer of power to the country’s poor majority through just and equitable distribution of land because this is the only durable solution to food insecurity and livelihood.

PKMT strongly demands comprehensive, genuine and practical steps to tackle the crises of food and unemployment in Tharparkar as soon as possible.

23 march 16 press releas sukkur urdu2 copy 23 march 2016 pr sindhi1 copy

PKMT Women Farmers Pledge to Resist Oppressive Forces!

Women Say No to Imperialist War and Aggression, Strengthen the Women’s Movement and Fight for National Liberation!

This International Women’s Day, March 8, we women must unite to fight repression, fascism, militarization and wars of aggression.  We must involve ourselves  in the struggle for  just peace as we took part  in the struggle to defend our lands,  our jobs, our livelihood and our rights.  We should affirm our commitment to build a strong women’s movement towards  women’s emancipation.  Women will never be free  in a free market economy where crisis plagues us all.  Imperialist wars of aggression are inevitable.  We must continue to defend  our country,  our sovereignty toward national liberation.

DSC_0830Women the world over are resisting wars of aggression and occupation. Women have joined and organized solidarity and protest actions against US wars in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Kurdistan, and in Syria and the occupation of Palestine.

This March 8, the International Women’s Alliance (IWA) and its member organizations will join the call to resist Imperialist plunder and war.

DSC_0800

Monopoly capitalism is in deep crises.  As the second cold war heats up, imperialist super powers led by the US prepare for the eventuality of a war.  They have intensified their wars and occupation across the globe — in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America—to maintain political and economic hegemony.  They have maintained puppet and client regimes to protect their economic interests all over the world.  They will protect their interests at all cost.  They have compelled  puppet regimes to pass  anti-terrorism and counter-insurgency measures targeting leaders, women and men, of national movements.Resistance against imperialism  have been met with violence and repression. Imperialist countries and puppet regimes connive to use sexual violence against women as a tool of war and curtail the fundamental rights of the people.

DSC_0925

DSC_0926

Treaties and agreements have been laid down for rapid forward deployment of US troops under the US Pivot to Asia as a springboard for US interventionist war in West Asia and the Middle East and to block off Russia, China and North Korea.

With the US Pivot to Asia, the US has laid down the framework for expanded defense relationship.  Through the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement in Australia, Philippines and Singapore, the US has unrestricted basing access anywhere in these countries. The US has also developed joint military exercise programs that engage the services of each nation to an average of 40 joint exercises per year. It conducts ballistic missile training using Patriot System at its bases and has confirmed the deployment of the most advanced missile defense systems in the world, the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense or THAAD.  The US has also succeeded in “normalizing US-Vietnam relations with the Joint Vision Statement signed in May last year, extending the Memorandum of Understanding for Advancing Bilateral Defense Cooperation.  It has ensured the support of Japan for the wars of aggression  with the signing of the Security Laws that circumvented the protectionist character of the Japanese constitution. Both Thailand and the Philippines signed a Mutual Defense Cooperation with the US.

DSC_0835

Women’s resistance is a product of the crisis of imperialism that perpetuates discrimination and oppression, racism and chauvinism, militarization, fascism and state terrorism, wars of aggression and occupation.

The peoples’ struggles, the women’s resistance are results of capitalist exploitation and oppression.  Imperialism has ignited the resistance of the women of the world.  Toiling women bear the brunt of the crises.  Peasant and indigenous women have remained the world’s poorest as states broker their lands to transnational corporations  and despotic local landlords continue to steal their share in tilling the land and connive with foreign interests  to turn lands into corporate farm, mining, eco-tourism and military camps that  displaced peoples and communities. Women workers face unemployment.  If and when hired, they keep on working even with lower wages under difficult working conditions.  They are the first to be fired as capitalists cut their production cost. They bear the brunt, not only of government neglect in providing quality public social services, but become victims of the Public Private Partnership policy that encourages private profit for public social security. Most women opt to work abroad and suffer the same exploitation in the hands of abusive employer.

The past years saw women at the forefront of the struggle against sexual abuse and oppression.  Peasant and indigenous women organize themselves and lead campaigns against landlord, land grabbers and against transnational corporations.  Women workers joined marches to demand for jobs, decent wages, better working conditions and the joined unions and stood at picketlines to demand worker’s rights protection and wage increase.  In capitalist countries, massive protest actions are being launched.  The people of color, joined by women of color,  in the United States and in many parts of the world have challenged racism,  state terrorism and has challenged neoliberal policies and capital exploitation.

More and more women are joining the struggle to fight for their rights and many more are joining resistance movements against the wars of aggression.  Women continue to work within people’s resistance movements in the struggle for national sovereignty and national liberation.

URDU Translation

IWA Statment I

IWA Statment IIPKMT Press Release

world women day 2016

SHO injured, 10 fall unconscious in police-villagers clash in Badin

Dawn Report | 3/2/2016

BADIN: A station house officer (SHO) was injured and 10 protesters, most of them women, fell unconscious when a strong contingent of police tried to evict several families allegedly occupying around seven acres of land in Sain Bux Rind village, located within the Ward-5 of the city, on Tuesday.

Witnesses said that a police force riding eight vans and an armoured personnel carrier surrounded the village and ordered its inhabitants to vacate the land immediately.

However, the villagers offered stiff resistance claiming that they had been living on these lands for more than four decades.

The police force moved into action and started demolishing the houses one after the other. The villagers, men and women, tried to physically stop the police from going ahead with the operation upon which they were baton-charged, which aggravated the situation. More people joined in the resistance and during the course of the clash, SHO of the Model police station Hakim Ali Jalbani, who was leading the operation, was attacked with a hatchet. Police lobbed teargas shells to disperse the protesters causing eight women and two children to fall unconscious.

The police officer was rushed to the Badin Civil Hospital where doctors referred him to the Hyderabad Civil Hospital due to his grave injuries.

According to villagers, two children jumped into the nearby canal when they could not bear the suffocation caused by teargas. They were unaccounted for till late in the evening, they added.

The villagers claimed that the land in question belonged to the Badin Industrial Zone and they had never been asked by any authority to vacate it until Deputy Commissioner Rafique Ahmed Qureshi recently leased out a portion of it to a friend of his, Tariq Ahmed. They alleged that the DC issued the eviction order to oblige the `buyer` and asked the area police to use force against them [occupants of the land].

The DC, however, insisted that the villagers were illegally occupying the land and would have to vacate it.

Reports reaching here late in the evening said that a 600-strong police force sent to the scene surrounded the village with the help of 15 vans and an armoured personnel carrier.

Four villagers were picked up on suspicion of their involvement in the attack on the SHO.

http://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=02_03_2016_119_001

 

UNEP-Women’s Major Group on COP21

Based on the Document: ‘Proposed resolution for UNEA on Paris Agreement’ & ‘A Reality Check on the Paris Agreement from the Women and Gender Constituency (WGC)’

While the others might want us to move forward with the process, the Women and Gender Constituency provided a reality check.

So, what does it really mean to promote an effective implementation of a weak agreement? We are talking about a binding legal document that doesn’t recognize historical responsibilities and continues to undermine the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities; hence, it lets countries decide how much longer and how they still want to continue to pollute, leaving all commitments to weak voluntary Intended National Determined Contributions (INDCs).

It is true that Parties to the UNFCCC committed to maintain a global average temperature below 1.5ºC but they failed to recognize and understand that in some areas such as Islands States, this ‘limit’ has been exceeded already by far and that it is already too late. The latest IPCC report says that doubling of greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere compared to what they were in 1750 will likely result in warming between 1.5°C to 4.5°C. Scientists haven’t managed to narrow this down since the IPCC was first set up. So, if the low figure is true, really radical action could limit warming to less than 1.5°C but if it’s the medium or higher figure then there’s no chance at all. For the Women and Gender Constituency, seeing this goal on paper is not enough. We demand it in actions as the proof of full commitment to that goal, not vague aspirations.

Thus, ‘making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate resilient development’ will result highly difficult especially in light of the corporate take over of the climate negotiations; the quality of and a goal for scaling up adequate and predictable, largely public finance which is highly needed, lost a lot of political strength while business interests that have lobbied hard in our home countries will be the first to benefit from the agreement as it fundamentally does not address the needs of the most vulnerable countries, communities and people of the world. It fails to address the structures of injustice and inequality which have caused the climate crisis and hold the historical polluters sufficiently to account. What happened in Paris was that governments maintained their commitment to corporations over people and signaled opportunities for profit to be made from crisis. The Green Climate Fund – for instance – is increasingly being captured by multilateral development banks and international private entities with poor track records. The lack of transparency and preponderance of big banks and international entities over national and sub-national entities blatantly defies the GCF mandate of being more responsive to the needs of vulnerable developing countries and communities.

What is left unclear in the Paris Agreement is how soon will the international community and specifically the world’s rich countries succeed in raising the estimated 100 billion dollars per year needed by 2020? Paragraph 54 on the agreement means no money on the table prior to 2020, just intention of mobilisation. In Cancun, Parties had agreed to developed countries mobilising USD 100 billion per year by 2020. With the Paris Agreement, a five-year extension has been granted in order to reach this target and a new quantified goal will be set for the period after 2025.

The Women and Gender Constituency has long argued that climate finance should come from taxing the highest 1% of emitters. A tax on high emitters of between 5-10% would provide at least USD 150 billion per year. Funds can also be derived from harmful industries. 80% of GHG emissions are caused by the burning of fossil fuels and the subsidies to this sector accounts for USD 5.3 trillion a year. Redirecting these subsidies prioritizing women and the poor could anchor a transformative shift.

Besides, a common understanding on what entails truly ‘sustainable energy’ is urgently needed. Currently, ‘clean’ energy sources allow dirty energies like large-scale wood-based bioenergy to be recognized as a ‘renewable’ energy source, and even harmful hydropower also enters the category. But what does an innovative’ large hydropower dam means for an entire ecosystem? What does the establishment of a single 500,000voltt tower in a rural area means to people, plants, animals, soil organisms and water sources? We are sure that there are real solutions out there such as solar and wind-power, and that genuine transformation to a low carbon society requires further analysis of what is that will actually take us on that path and what would drive us apart.

Critical issues like clear emission reductions without offsetting and misleading market approaches; ensuring the quality of technologies which should be safe and socially and environmentally sound; the responsibilities of developed countries to take the lead, the responsibility to protect people’s rights and our ecosystems including indigenous peoples and women’s rights, have been either surgically removed throughout the text or lack specificity; that we are not protecting food security but instead are protecting food production, all of them, are issues that jeopardize the whole 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development Agenda and its SDGs, such as Goal 12 on Sustainable Consumption and Production, to name but one example. Unsustainable food systems are not given enough attention and most rhetoric, fails to recognize the importance of this issue, not just on the context of climate change but also in the context of poverty eradication. A clear example is the increased deforestation in Paraguay – also undermining Goal 15 – and associated social problematic (Goal 1) due to GM soy and cattle ranch expansion. Exclusionary methods such as increased carbon trading which are now expanded to the agricultural sector, and land use change (LULUCF); the flawed ‘Net zero emissions’ principle and unproved technologies such as BECCs, gained further support while the human rights language was weakened.

The ‘loss and damage’ mechanism mentioned in Article 8, that would have meant compensation to those most affected from climate change, lost all significance on paragraph 52 Presented by Isis Alvarez at the Open Ended Committee of Permanent Representatives to the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) when is states “that Article 8 of the Agreement does not involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation”. At the same time, climate refugees continue to be ignored and the agreement failed to be transformative and legally recognize them.

Perverse initiatives endorsed by the Paris agreement such as Climate Smart Agriculture surrender too much power to already powerful multinational corporations monopolizing the food industry setting the stage for the further demise of small peasant farmers especially women and their related traditional knowledge. Already a report from FAO (2014) demonstrated how agroecology could feed the world without the need for harmful and misleading technologies while empowering small scale farmers.

We know that climate change is the greatest threat to rights in our time, and we know that women often bear the brunt of these impacts. We believe that operational language on gender equality, alongside other fundamental rights, in Article 2, defining the purpose of the agreement, would have gone far to ensure that all forthcoming climate actions take into account the rights, needs and perspectives of women and men and encourage women’s full and equal participation in decision-making. This was the moment to set the right path, the just path for climate action. But it just didnt happen. SDG 13 needs to go beyond the Paris agreement.

To call this an ‘ambitious agreement’ is totally misleading. Civil society organizations and social movements openly protested the outcome of the negotiations. Women of the world have been calling for climate justice, and we know that calls for climate justice are empty without acknowledging that ‘justice’ requires a remedy, justice is delivered when reparations are provided, and justice is essentially for accountability.

Presented by Isis Alvarez at the Open Ended Committee of Permanent Representatives to the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)

Multinationals hike drug prices by 15pc

Dawn, February 11th, 2016

ASIF CHAUDHRY

LAHORE: Six multinational pharmaceutical companies have increased the prices of medicines by 15 per cent without approval from the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (Drap), triggering a controversy over the drug pricing mechanism in the country.

According to a senior official, the move has led to an artificial shortage of medicines. He said the companies which had increased the prices were GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Sanofi-aventis, Abbott Laboratories, Novartis, Otsuka and Reckitt Benckiser. The medicines produced by the companies, he added, were used for the treatment of cardiac ailments, blood pressure, weakness, fever and as painkillers. Some of them were recommended to women during pregnancy.

He said that because patients were already suffering due to the high cost of drugs, a 15pc increase in their prices would only compound their problems.

The pharmaceutical companies, he explained, had directed their staff to charge customers as per the new rates, causing a shortage of many life-saving drugs and creating space for ‘mafia’ to move in and take advantage of the situation by fleecing patients.

Some pharmaceutical firms had directed their staff to retrieve unsold stocks from the market and update the prices, the official said.

“The companies have increased the prices on their own,” said Dr Mohammad Aslam Afghani, the Drap’s chief executive officer. “Drap had no role in this move.” He explained that Drap’s drug pricing committee had not raised the prices. “The multinational companies increased the prices after claiming that the Sindh High Court had granted them permission and later they got a stay order from the court,” he said, adding that Drap would challenge the decision and have the stay vacated.

In response to the controversial move, the Punjab government ordered the district administrations to thwart attempts to increase the prices through regulations. In a notice issued on Feb 8, Punjab’s chief drug controller, Dr Zakaur Rehman, directed all drug controllers, deputy drug controllers and drug inspectors to frequently visit the markets and prepare a list of companies that had increased their prices.

“You are further directed to probe the issue of non-availability/acute shortage of some potentially required medicines in the market and furnish the list of non-available/less available drugs sold at more than MRPs,” he said.

The notice also named the six multinational pharmaceutical companies which had increased the prices.

One of these companies, GSK, wrote a letter to wholesalers and cited the reasons behind the price hike. A copy of the letter is available with Dawn.

The letter said that GSK had filed several cases for the hardship price increase of certain products with Drap in 2012.

“As three years lapsed and the cases remained pending despite the statutory assurance by Drap to provide relief through the Drug Pricing Policy 2015, we were constrained to seek enforcement of hardship price increase through the Sindh High Court,” it said.

The company informed the wholesalers and distributors that prices of drugs including Panadol 500mg, Panadol Extra, Panadol CF, Panadol drops, Actifed P Elixir, and Actifed DM cough syrup had gone up.

Senior pharmacist and legal expert Noor Mohammad Mahar condemned the price hike and said it had created serious problems for poor patients.

He said the companies in question were already earning good profits from their products.

Mr Mahar held the Drap’s senior officials responsible for the hike. “They are behind this move. They (also) did nothing when these multinational companies increased prices by 15pc in 2013.”

Aamir Shafaat Khan in Karachi adds: The multinational companies had increased the prices by up to 50pc over the last one month, said chief of the Pakistan Chemists and Druggists Association (PCDA), Riyaz Hussain.

Talking by phone from Peshawar, he said local manufacturers of medicines would also increase the prices of their products.

“With decrease in the prices of petroleum products, various commodities are becoming cheaper. How can the production cost of these MNCs go up,” he wondered.

Mr Hussain said the PCDA condemned the hike in drug prices and would urge the government to waive general sales tax on medicines.

The association held a demonstration outside the Peshawar Press Club on Wednesday, demanding cut in drug prices.

http://www.dawn.com/news/1238769

MONSANTO TO PAY $80 MILLION TO SETTLE CHARGE OF IMPROPER ACCOUNTING

International New York Times, FEB. 9, 2016

LIZ MOYER

Monsanto will pay $80 million in penalties to the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle claims that it misstated earnings after failing to properly account for the costs of a sales rebate program for its flagship herbicide product, Roundup.

The S.E.C. said Monsanto, an agribusiness giant based in St. Louis, had insufficient internal controls to properly track millions of dollars in rebates it offered to Roundup retailers and distributors. The rebates were part of a promotion that Monsanto ran after sales of a generic version of the product undercut its business in 2009.

Monsanto booked substantial revenue as a result of the sales promotion from 2009 through 2011, but it did not recognize related costs, which led it to misstate corporate profits over a three-year period.

It is one of the largest accounting-related settlements by the S.E.C. since Mary Jo White took over as chairman of the agency in 2013 with a plan to refocus on corporate accounting abuses as investigations related to the financial crisis were ending.

Accounting cases more than doubled, to 114 through September 2015, from 53 for the same period in 2013. Last June, the S.E.C. struck a $190 million civil settlement with Computer Sciences Corp. and charged eight former employees and executives with manipulating financial results.

“Corporations must be truthful in their earnings releases to investors and have sufficient internal accounting controls in place to prevent misleading statements,” Ms. White said on Tuesday.

Failing to recognize expenses related to rebates “is the latest page from a well-worn playbook of accounting misstatements,” she said.

Monsanto, which is neither admitting nor denying wrongdoing, also agreed to hire a consultant to review its financial reporting of rebate programs for its crop protection business. In a statement, the company said it previously disclosed the investigation and restated its earnings for 2009 through 2011 at the end of 2011.

“The company is pleased to put this matter behind it,” the statement said.

Monsanto’s chief executive, Hugh Grant, reimbursed the company $3,165,852 for cash bonuses and stock awards he received during the period in question, and its former chief financial officer, Carl Casale, returned $728,843 in compensation.

The S.E.C. said it did not find any personal misconduct on either man’s part and would not pursue clawbacks under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

In addition, three accounting and sales executives will also pay penalties totaling $185,000, and the accountants agreed to be temporarily suspended from practicing before the S.E.C.

Roundup, one of Monsanto’s most profitable products, began losing market share after competitors undercut its sales with cheaper generic brands. In 2009, Monsanto introduced a rebate program that would help make up for price reductions in the product in subsequent years if retailers and distributors met certain sales goals.

Roughly a third of Monsanto’s Roundup sales that year occurred in the fourth quarter, when the rebate program was introduced. Monsanto delayed reporting the costs of the rebate program until 2010.

A new rebate program was created in 2010, under which Monsanto paid $44.5 million to its two largest distributors. The program was repeated the next year, and Monsanto deferred recording the rebate costs from 2010 into 2011.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/10/business/dealbook/monsanto-to-pay-80-million-to-settle-charges-of-improper-accounting.html